IT Forensics · OSINT

Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act (GewO): Why LanCologne is not a private investigation agency

In Germany, only the commercial protection of life or property (the security industry) is subject to a specific licensing requirement under Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act. LanCologne does not carry out any such security activities, nor is it a detective agency; our OSINT investigations are conducted exclusively as supplementary technical support for existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate cases.

Enquire without obligation

This point is particularly important in OSINT research, as the scope, quality and reliability of publicly available information can vary greatly depending on the research question, the individual or organisation concerned, and the platform used. Corporate research, an infrastructure analysis and the verification of a single piece of social media content must not be treated in the same way. The source, timeliness, verifiability and legal framework determine which information is reliable and which research method is appropriate.

We therefore deliberately and consistently limit our OSINT services to providing supplementary digital forensic support for existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate matters, and do not carry out independent searches for individuals or investigative work in the manner of a private investigation agency.

Why LanCologne?

LanCologne does not conduct OSINT investigations according to a standardised, one-size-fits-all approach, but rather on the basis of the specific issue to be proven, the available public sources and the relevant legal framework. Our staff have decades of experience in information technology and many years of practical experience in IT forensics. We assist companies, solicitors and private individuals, as well as regularly supporting courts and public authorities, in the technical investigation of digital matters.

Research is always carried out in a documented and traceable manner. Where technically possible, publicly accessible online content that is found is archived promptly or saved as a screenshot in order to preserve its evidential value, even if the original content is subsequently altered or deleted.

Our working methods and the tools we use

Our OSINT investigation does not begin with an unstructured online search, but rather by contextualising the specific evidential question within the framework of an existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate case. Only then is it determined which publicly available digital sources may be relevant to the question and in what order they should be examined.

The next step is to define the research strategy. In doing so, we determine whether relevant information can be obtained from social media, public registers, technical infrastructure data or generally accessible web content. The selection of sources is based solely on the specific question to be proven, not on the mere availability of individual tools.

Every step of the research process and every piece of digital evidence found is documented with a timestamp and a reference to the source and, where technically possible, saved in the form of a screenshot or an archived copy. This ensures traceability is maintained even if the original online content has since been altered or deleted.

Before we accept an OSINT enquiry, we check whether it falls within our scope of services as supplementary digital forensic support; we transparently decline enquiries that amount to independent investigative or detective work, or refer clients to appropriately authorised providers.

For readers unfamiliar with the subject, one point is particularly important: an OSINT tool does not automatically „find" the truth. It aggregates and links publicly available information according to programmed rules, meaning that outdated, incorrect or deliberately misleading online content may be incorporated into a result without being detected. That is why, when dealing with critical findings, we check the source of the information and whether a second, independent source confirms the same facts.

For our OSINT research, we use established tools such as Maltego, SpiderFoot and Shodan, supplemented by structured manual research via search engines, social media and public registers. Our OSINT services are always provided as a complementary component to existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate enquiries, and not as a standalone people search or investigative activity in the sense of a private detective agency. If a request falls outside this scope, we will make this clear rather than tacitly providing a service that is not covered.

Typical areas of application

•Judicial and non-judicial expert reports
•Supplementary investigations as part of existing IT forensic investigations
•Support for businesses, solicitors, courts and public authorities
•Verification of digital traces and online content
•Analysis of corporate, infrastructure and threat intelligence from open sources
•Investigating incidents of fraud, trademark infringement and cyber security breaches
•Cross-checking of automatically generated search results
•Documentation and archiving of ephemeral online content
•Documentation for courts, solicitors, insurance companies, public authorities and businesses

This is how OSINT research works

1Classification of the question of evidence

First of all, we clarify the IT forensic, legal or internal corporate context of the investigation and the specific question to be answered. This determines the scope and limits of the subsequent investigation.

2Selection of sources

The question of evidence determines which publicly available sources – such as social media, registers, technical infrastructure data or general web content – may be relevant.

3Structured research

The research is carried out using our established tools as well as structured manual checks. Each step is documented to ensure that the process is traceable.

4Archiving and Documentation

Where technically feasible, relevant online content is archived promptly or saved as a timestamped screenshot in order to preserve its evidential value even if it is subsequently altered.

5Multi-stage evaluation

The information found is analysed in a structured manner and, where possible, cross-checked against other independent sources in order to avoid errors arising from reliance on a single source.

6Manual validation

In the case of findings that are particularly relevant to the evidence or unusual, we manually verify the source, context and plausibility in order to rule out automated misinterpretations or deliberate disinformation.

7Report and reference to evidence

At the end, we do not simply list the findings of our research. We explain which source supports each finding, what conclusions can be drawn, and where the limits of our research lie.

Why is this area of investigation relevant to forensics?

In Germany, only the commercial protection of life or property (the security industry) is subject to a specific licensing requirement under Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act. LanCologne does not carry out any such security activities, nor is it a detective agency; our OSINT investigations are conducted exclusively as supplementary technical support for existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate cases.

The forensic value lies not solely in the volume of information found, but in its source and reliability. A single social media post, a register entry or a technical infrastructure note can be misleading without context. That is why we document how a piece of information may have come about, what alternative explanations exist and what further sources support the finding.

We therefore deliberately and consistently limit our OSINT services to providing supplementary digital forensic support for existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate matters, and do not carry out independent searches for individuals or investigative work in the manner of a private investigation agency.

Particularly in the case of OSINT research, attempts at full verification may also reach their limits if online content has been deleted, made private or deliberately designed to be misleading. A lack of verifiability, closed platforms and rapidly changing content highlight why timely documentation and transparent communication of existing limitations are so important prior to the actual analysis. Omissions at this stage cannot always be rectified later on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does LanCologne require a licence under Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act to carry out OSINT research?+
No. A licence under Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act (GewO) is required solely for the commercial protection of life or property; we do not carry out this activity.
Is LanCologne a private investigation agency?+
No. Our OSINT investigations are carried out solely as supplementary technical support for existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate cases.
What professional regulations apply to your work instead?+
As an IT forensic service provider, we are subject to the general provisions of commercial law and data protection law, without being subject to any specific licensing requirement under Section 34a of the German Trade Regulation Act (GewO).
Does the fact that you are not officially registered as a private investigation agency affect the quality of your work?+
No. Our investigations are carried out in accordance with the same forensic quality standards as the rest of our IT forensic work, regardless of commercial law categories.

LanCologne – IT Forensics OSINT Cologne

Do you require a professional OSINT investigation into „Section 34a of the Trade Regulation Act (GewO): Why LanCologne is not a private investigation agency"? LanCologne supports you in the structured, documented analysis of publicly available digital sources in the context of existing IT forensic, legal or internal corporate issues. The key objective here is not to generate as many hits as possible, but to secure technically sound and verifiable information.

Get in touch now