IT Forensics · Private Individuals
How can I have digital evidence processed for use in a tenancy or neighbourhood dispute?
In disputes over tenancy or neighbourhood issues, it is often one person’s word against another’s. Digital evidence – chat histories with the landlord, videos of noise or damage, photos of the condition of the flat, sensor readings – can support your version of events, provided their origin and the time they were recorded can be verified.
Why this question is important for private individuals
In cases of personal injury, accidents and legal disputes, digital data may contain crucial temporal or technical information. However, its evidential value depends on its origin, completeness and context. An independent investigation prevents a single timestamp or screenshot from being over-interpreted.
Technical background
Typical weaknesses include a lack of time stamps (videos with no verifiable date), incomplete chat logs and recordings whose admissibility is questionable. Measurements from noise apps are of limited value without a calibrated device.
Relevant evidence and data sources
- Chat histories and emails with metadata
- Photos and videos with original metadata
- Smart home and sensor protocols
- Noise diary apps with data export
Borders
- Whether covert recordings may be used is a legal question.
- Noise measurements taken with smartphones are no substitute for a calibrated measurement.
Possible results
- Documented backup with a timeline
- Assessment of the reliability of individual pieces of evidence
Why LanCologne?
Private IT forensic investigations often have immediate personal, financial or legal consequences. It is therefore not enough simply to open the data using an analysis programme.
Here’s how we do it
- Clarify which claim is to be substantiated.
- Backing up the originals from the device, not just the forwarded files.
- Validation of dates and completeness.
Technical data must be interpreted in context
A log entry, location point or file timestamp is, first and foremost, a technical artefact. Only by understanding the logic behind its creation and comparing it with other independent data sources can a reliable interpretation be made.
Preserving evidence does not automatically mean assessing evidence
LanCologne can secure and analyse digital data and explain its technical significance. Whether a piece of evidence is admissible in court, what claims may arise from it, or how a court will assess it, remains separate from the technical analysis.
Why use LanCologne for private IT forensic evidence cases?
LanCologne does not conduct investigations with the aim of confirming the client’s assumption. We formulate a verifiable technical question of evidence, work on the basis of the available primary data, and document positive, negative and inconclusive findings. The result should be comprehensible to the private client and technically verifiable by a solicitor, insurance company, investigating authority, court or another IT forensic expert.
Legal framework
Which statutory provisions are relevant depends on the specific circumstances of the case. In the event of unauthorised access to data subject to special security measures, Sections 202a et seq. of the German Criminal Code (StGB) may be applicable. In cases of fraud or computer-related financial loss, Sections 263 and 263a of the German Criminal Code (StGB) may be particularly relevant, depending on the circumstances. In cases of stalking, Section 238 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) may be relevant. However, it is not the IT forensic expert who determines the criminal classification.
In the case of private audio recordings, Section 201 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) must be observed. Subject to certain conditions, this provision protects the confidentiality of words spoken in private. The technical feasibility of analysing a recording must therefore be distinguished from the question of whether it was lawfully made or used.
Photographs and video recordings may raise issues relating to the right to privacy and data protection. Sections 22 and 23 of the Artistic Copyright Act (KunstUrhG) contain provisions relating to images in particular. Section 201a of the Criminal Code (StGB) may also apply to certain types of photographic recordings. In the case of private cameras, dashcams or smart home systems, additional data protection issues may arise, which must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Electronic documents may form part of the evidence presented at an on-site inspection in civil proceedings pursuant to section 371 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). Sections 402 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) apply to expert evidence. A privately commissioned IT forensic report does not automatically become a court expert report; however, it can present technical facts, primary data and questions of evidence in a manner that is comprehensible to both the lawyer and the court.
LanCologne provides technical findings of fact; it does not offer legal advice. Questions regarding admissibility, admissibility as evidence, liability, claims or criminal liability are a matter for solicitors, investigating authorities and the courts.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I have digital evidence processed for use in a tenancy or neighbourhood dispute?
Am I allowed to film my neighbour?
Is a WhatsApp export enough?
Is it worth it when the amount in dispute is small?
LanCologne – IT Forensics for Private Individuals
Do you have a digital enquiry? LanCologne can assist you with an objective, unbiased IT forensic investigation.
Related to this topic
- How can I have digital evidence from a smart home secured for use in a private dispute?
- How can I have data from USB-Sticks, memory cards or external hard drives secured as private evidence?
- How can I have deleted files on a private storage device examined forensically?
- How should I back up my digital data before changing my passwords or resetting my device?